Tag Archives: ELT
IDIOMS: OPPOSITES AND ORIGIN
Lingva Workshop No. 14
Idioms: Opposites and Origin Lesson Plan
for (young) adults, level B2
by Katarina Ristic
LINE UP ACCORDINGLY
Lingva Workshop No.14
Line Up Accordingly Lesson Plan
Line Up Accordingly Handout
for young learners and teenagers, Level A2
by Lora Petronic-Petrovic
DOWN BY THE BAY
Lingva Workshop No.14
Down by the Bay Lesson Plan
Down by the Bay Lyrics
for Young Learners and Teenagers, Level A2
by Marija Milovanovic
Lingva Summer Workshop No. 14

Lingva Workshop June 2011 - From right to left: Marija Milovanovic, Katarina Ristic and Katarina Andric
On June 23, 2011, Lingva teachers held the 14th In-house Lingva Workshop. The workshop covered both original work and modifications of activities described in ELT literature or of those presented in other workshops or seminars. There were five 45 minute sessions on the following topics:
1.Down by the Bay by Marija Milanovic
2.Line Up Accordingly by Lora Petronic-Petrovic
3.Idioms: Opposites and Origins by Katarina Ristic
4.Creative Writing by Katarina Andric
5.(English) Language by Mirjana Ljiljak-Vukajlovic
See details in Lesson Plans for (Young) Adults and Lesson Plans for Young Learners and Teenagers.
LINGVA WORKSHOP 13 – WRITING ASSESSMENT STANDARDISATION

Lingva Workshop Feb 2011 – From left to right: Mirjana Ljiljak-Vukajlovic, Marija Matic and Katarina Andric
On February 18, 2011, Lingva Language School organised the thirteen in-house workshop dedicated to assessment standardisation, this time with calibrated written samples, as recommended by YALS Association of Language Schools of Serbia and on the basis of resources received from EAQUALS.
The participants were first familiarized with overall writing assessment criteria by CEFR levels, which was followed by a more thorough examination of the criteria of range, accuracy and coherence, as well as those of description and argument. Then the standardisation training was conducted using calibrated CEFR illustrative writing samples and CEFR Writing Assessment Grid, provided by EAQUALS, and following the recommended stages of individual rating, pair/small group rating and whole group discussion. One of the general conclusions reached during feedback was that teachers at Lingva were relatively stricter in their assessment, especially with respect to the criterion of accuracy.










